Mark Plummer Sues His Own Clients
Mark B. Plummer is the sole corporate officer, member, and agent of service, for Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer. Plummer operates out of his residential garage at 18552 Oriente Drive Yorba Linda, CA 92886.
PLUMMER IN PRO PER SUES HIS OWN CLIENTS
On May 10, 2019 Plaintiff filed Case. No. 30-2019-01069271 Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer vs. Mark Sugamele which resulted in a dismissal on June 6, 2019.
On May 26, 2020, Plaintiff Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer and Mark Plummer filed OCSC Case 30-2020-01140140-CL-CO-CJC Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer vs. Joe Diaz.
On December 17, 2020 Plummer filed OCSC Case No. 30-2020-01174990-CU-FR-CJC Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer, PC Vs. Travelers Insurance for “FRAUD”.
On November 22, 2019 Plummer filed OCSC Case No. 30-2019-01113991-CL-BC-CJC Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer, Pc Vs. KTM Enterprises, Inc for “breach of contract. This resulted in a dismissal on December 20, 2019
On November April 29, 2015 Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer filed OCSC Case No. 30-2015-00785129 Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer, PC Vs. Leonard Riley. This resulted in a court ordered dismissal on August 16, 2016.
On Jan. 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed the OCSC case captioned Mark Plummer Vs. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 30-2016-00831688-CU-FR-CJC. As to OCSC case number 30-2016-00831688, the named plaintiff was “Mark B. Plummer” and was dismissed.
PLUMMER IN PRO PER SUES ASSOCIATE ATTORNEYS
On Nov 9, 2017 Plaintiff filed Case No. G053836 Law Offices of Mark B Plummer, PC vs Bayuk et al. and that case was finally determined adverse to Plaintiff. The named appellant in appellate court case number G053836 was “Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer PC.”
OCSC case number 30-2014-00759128 shows the filing of the opinion under Appellate Court case number G053836. (See https://casetext.com/case/law-offices-of-mark-b-plummer-pc-v-bayuk and Law Offices of Mark B. Plummer PC v. Bayuk, G053836 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2017)
PLUMMER SANCTIONED FOR OVER $10,000 IN PENALTIES BY COURTS
On Nov 19, 2012 Mark B. Plummer and Law Offices of Mark Plummer filed case Orange County Superior Court case 30-2012-00613521-CU-OE-CJC captioned Newchurch v. ADP Dealer Services, Inc., where Plummer was sanctioned by the court for bad conduct for $10,000. Plummer also is alleged to have abandoned his client, and caused her to pay the ultimate price by losing her case.
PLUMMER SANCTIONED FOR MISCONDUCT BY COURT OF APPEALS
On October 11, 2017, Plummer was also professionally admonished by the Court of appeals for misstatements, untruths, and citing phantom case law in Jones vs. Feldsott CA4/3 G053974 (Super. Ct. No. 30-2014-00758872).
The Court of Appeals stated:
“Finally, we cannot overlook the numerous and egregious violations of the California Rules of Court and the principles of appellate practice committed by Jones’ Counsel [Mark B. Plummer], beginning with an opening brief that exceeded the word count limit of rule 8.204(c)(1) by over 1,500 words. Rule 8.1115 was also ignored. In the reply brief, counsel repeatedly referred to a fictional request for judicial notice, violating the rule that limits assertions of fact to matters in the record. (See Liberty National Enterprises, L.P. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co. (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 839, 845-846; Dominguez v. Financial Indemnity Co. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 388, 392, fn. 2.) The reply brief includes other references to factual matters not in the record.
Far more serious, however, were the repeated misrepresentations of the cases cited to support appellant’s arguments. For example, counsel frequently asserted that the fee-waiver cases cited in the opening brief approved of “disgorgement” of attorney fees as a remedy for a conflict-of-interest ethical violation.”
01
Project Name
This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.
02
Project Name
This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.
03
Project Name
This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.
04
Project Name
This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.
